I don't remember the user names, but 2 of the first 5 people that created a "digg" after Janet Folger's article chastising Joseph Farah's opinion both stated that they will vote for the Constitution Party for President and that they will not be voting for evil in the election. Making diggs like that will not change Ms. Folger's mind nor should it be the goal. The goal is to state a solid reason or reasons why the CP is the better choice and this can impact the readers of the article who read the diggs afterward. Small victories like this can influence dozens which lead to influencing hundreds and so on. Keep up the efforts like those two individuals. btw, responding quickly to an article on any site is important since readers like myself will probably just skim the first 7 or so responses before the dialogue devolves to its most base arguments.

I have written Janet Folger before and have gotten no response. You would think that for her audience the thought of one party endorsing the slaughter of 50 million pre born children and the other party standing by with their hands in their pockets would be enough to get them to at least consider Chuck. But these media types have convinced themselves that they have some kind of influence in the GOP. The fact that John McCain is the candidate proves they have no influence whatsoever. They truly are the blind leading the blind.

Ray