Plausible deniability strikes again and no clear, concise and specific answers. What a joke!

I have a feeling that you really were not interested in "specific answers" but to ask many questions and find a way to disrupt. Reminds me of times I would have a suspect and they would continue to try to grind you down by asking multiple questions and then multiple questions of questions, etc.

Do you really care-or are you tryingto be glib, disruptive, sabatouer? If you are genuine, please look at platform as it is written. After this, you may want to listen to old speech at CP sight and the Peroutka2004 site, in particular, Peroutka, Lofton and Baldwin, also good, Phillips speech.

As for consise English, what is "plausible deniability" in what posters have responded to? usually when one uses that charge, it means people are saying 2 different things at once, denying one or both or not being specific. The movies, speeches, platforms, etc are all pretty transparent and clear.

By leaving the conduct and judgement to the people in a republic, the government will only get involved at the public's request and not interfere in people's lives based on a political whim.

In some middle-east countries where corrupt theocracies rule, you can literally be arrested and tortured for just having your beard too long according to some scripture passage. If women don't stay covered up they could be publicly stoned.

Here in America it takes a collection of signatures to get an issue on the ballot then a legislatures has to vote on it 2/3rds to propose 3/4ths to ratify. Then an executive can either sign it into law or veto it. If it gets vetoed then the legislature can override the veto by a 60% majority.

Here in America the senators and the representatives are beholden to the will of the people and not some religious book or religious/political figure.